Monday, March 21, 2016
Psychiatry's main focus has been on functional disorders. Functional disorders do not have an observable pathology. This has made psychiatry awkward and artificial. The path for the physiological definition of neurology has been discovered and proved, but the path for the physiological definition for functional disorders, (that is the main focus of psychiatry) has not yet been discovered since, functional disorders do no have an observable pathology hence, psychiatry is a false medical science.
Psychiatry's main focus has been on functional disorders. Functional disorders do not have an observable pathology. This has made psychiatry awkward and artificial. The path for the physiological definition of neurology has been discovered and proved, but the path for the physiological definition of functional disorders, (that is the main focus of psychiatry) has not yet been discovered since, functional disorders do not have an observable pathology hence, psychiatry is false.
The Future of Eugenics. Eugenics, although based on the science of genetics, is not itself a science, for it must above all concern itself with social values, with the question: Whither mankind? Perhaps general agreement could be had that freedom from gross physical or mental defects and the possession of sound health, high intelligence, general adaptability, and nobility of spirit are the major goals toward which eugenics should aim; perhaps even that diversity of nature is better than uniformity of type. But how far ought selective reproduction to interfere with human freedoms? Genetically, as in other respects, "there is so much bad in the best of us and so much good in the worst of us" that it is hard to assess if the worth of the manifested hereditary characteristics are the product of environment, particularly for those qualities that are eugenics' major concern: sound health, high intelligence, and the like. The Jukes and Kallikaks were horrible examples of degenerate humanity, but what might they have been in a better world? Were their alcoholism, their crime, and their vice inescapable products of their genes? It seems very doubtful. Only the experiment of putting them from earliest infancy into an optimum environment--not forgetting that it need not be the same for everyone--than to modify gene frequencies by wise selection. Once mankind has produced an approximation of that optimum environment, the eugenics task will be much simpler. In fact, the natural selection exerted by such an environment may make eugenics quite unnecessary. -H. Bentley Glass
The Future of Eugenics.
Eugenics, although based on the science of genetics, is not itself a science, for it must above all concern itself with social values, with the question: Whither mankind?
Perhaps general agreement could be had that freedom from gross physical or mental defects and the possession of sound health, high intelligence, general adaptability, and nobility of spirit are the major goals toward which eugenics should aim; perhaps even that diversity of nature is better than uniformity of type.
But how far ought selective reproduction to interfere with human freedoms?
Genetically, as in other respects, "there is so much bad in the best of us and so much good in the worst of us" that it is hard to assess if the worth of the manifested hereditary characteristics are the product of environment, particularly for those qualities that are eugenics' major concern: sound health, high intelligence, and the like.
The Jukes and Kallikaks were horrible examples of degenerate humanity, but what might they have been in a better world?
Were their alcoholism, their crime, and their vice inescapable products of their genes? It seems very doubtful.
Only the experiment of putting them from earliest infancy into an optimum environment--not forgetting that it need not be the same for everyone--than to modify gene frequencies by wise selection.
Once mankind has produced an approximation of that optimum environment, the eugenics task will be much simpler.
In fact, the natural selection exerted by such an environment may make eugenics quite unnecessary.
-H. Bentley Glass
Eugenics, although based on the science of genetics, is not itself a science, for it must above all concern itself with social values, with the question: Whither mankind?
Perhaps general agreement could be had that freedom from gross physical or mental defects and the possession of sound health, high intelligence, general adaptability, and nobility of spirit are the major goals toward which eugenics should aim; perhaps even that diversity of nature is better than uniformity of type.
But how far ought selective reproduction to interfere with human freedoms?
Genetically, as in other respects, "there is so much bad in the best of us and so much good in the worst of us" that it is hard to assess if the worth of the manifested hereditary characteristics are the product of environment, particularly for those qualities that are eugenics' major concern: sound health, high intelligence, and the like.
The Jukes and Kallikaks were horrible examples of degenerate humanity, but what might they have been in a better world?
Were their alcoholism, their crime, and their vice inescapable products of their genes? It seems very doubtful.
Only the experiment of putting them from earliest infancy into an optimum environment--not forgetting that it need not be the same for everyone--than to modify gene frequencies by wise selection.
Once mankind has produced an approximation of that optimum environment, the eugenics task will be much simpler.
In fact, the natural selection exerted by such an environment may make eugenics quite unnecessary.
-H. Bentley Glass
My blogs prove how secret societies popularization of esoteric ideology and universal collectivism aides the process preceeding achieved world government future realization.
Click here to learn more about the Illuminati.
Psychiatry's main focus has been on functional disorders. Functional disorders do not have an observable pathology. This has made psychiatry awkward and artificial. The path for the physiological definition of neurology has been discovered and proved, but the path for the physiological definition for functional disorders, (that is the main focus of psychiatry) has not yet been discovered since, functional disorders do no have an observable pathology.
Psychiatry's main focus has been on functional disorders. Functional disorders do not have an observable pathology. This has made psychiatry awkward and artificial. The path for the physiological definition of neurology has been discovered and proved, but the path for the physiological definition for functional disorders, (that is the main focus of psychiatry) has not yet been discovered since, functional disorders do no have an observable pathology.
My blogs prove how secret societies popularization of esoteric ideology and universal collectivism aides the process preceeding achieved world government future realization.
Click here to learn more about the Illuminati.
In the 1950s and 60s, the CIA engaged in an extensive program of human experimentation [MKULTRA], using drugs, psychological, and other means, in search of techniques to control human behavior for counterintelligence and covert action purposes.
In the 1950s and 60s, the CIA engaged in an extensive program of human experimentation [MKULTRA], using drugs, psychological, and other means, in search of techniques to control human behavior for counterintelligence and covert action purposes… Most of the MKULTRA records were deliberately destroyed in 1973 by the order of then DCI Richard Helms…Helms testified that he agreed to destroy the records because ‘there had been relationships with outsiders in government agencies and other organizations and that these would be sensitive in this kind of a thing but that since the [mind-control] program was over and finished and done with, we thought we would just get rid of files as well, so that anybody who assisted us in the past would not be subject to follow-up questions, embarrassment, if you will.’”
Helms was not only admitting he destroyed the records, he was stating that the MKULTRA program deployed, through contracts, “outsiders” to carry out mind control experiments. He was determined to protect the outsiders, to keep their identity and work secret. He was also dedicated to preventing these people from exposing the nature of their mind-control work. Subsequently, some of these “outsiders” have been revealed.
But no one really knows how deep, far, and wide the CIA penetrated into academic and research communities to enable MKULTRA.
So…can we go back in time and find evidence that the CIA embraced goals that would take their mind-control research right up through the present day?
Yes.
Goal: develop drugs to transform individuals…and even, by implication, society. Drug research going far beyond the usual brief descriptions of MKULTRA.
A CIA document was included in the transcript of the 1977 US Senate Hearings on MKULTRA, the CIA’s mind-control program. The document is found in Appendix C, starting on page 166. It’s simply labeled “Draft,” dated 5 May 1955.
It begins: “A portion of the Research and Development Program of [CIA’s] TSS/Chemical Division is devoted to the discovery of the following materials and methods:” What followed was a list of hoped-for drugs and their uses. The range of CIA intentions was stunning.
The CIA wanted to find substances which would “promote illogical thinking and impulsiveness.” Serious consideration should be given to the idea that psychiatric medications, food additives, herbicides, and industrial chemicals (like fluorides) would eventually satisfy that requirement.
The CIA wanted to find chemicals that “would produce the signs and symptoms of recognized diseases in a reversible way.” This suggests many possibilities—among them the use of drugs to fabricate diseases and thereby give the false impression of germ-caused epidemics.
The CIA wanted to find drugs that would “produce amnesia.” Ideal for discrediting whistleblowers, dissidents, certain political candidates, and other investigators. (Scopolamine, for example.)
The CIA wanted to discover drugs which would produce “paralysis of the legs, acute anemia, etc.” A way to make people decline in health as if from diseases.
The CIA wanted to develop drugs that would “alter personality structure” and thus induce a person’s dependence on another person. How about dependence in general? For instance, dependence on institutions, governments?
The CIA wanted to discover chemicals that would “lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men.” Sounds like a general description of the devolution of society.
Helms was not only admitting he destroyed the records, he was stating that the MKULTRA program deployed, through contracts, “outsiders” to carry out mind control experiments. He was determined to protect the outsiders, to keep their identity and work secret. He was also dedicated to preventing these people from exposing the nature of their mind-control work. Subsequently, some of these “outsiders” have been revealed.
But no one really knows how deep, far, and wide the CIA penetrated into academic and research communities to enable MKULTRA.
So…can we go back in time and find evidence that the CIA embraced goals that would take their mind-control research right up through the present day?
Yes.
Goal: develop drugs to transform individuals…and even, by implication, society. Drug research going far beyond the usual brief descriptions of MKULTRA.
A CIA document was included in the transcript of the 1977 US Senate Hearings on MKULTRA, the CIA’s mind-control program. The document is found in Appendix C, starting on page 166. It’s simply labeled “Draft,” dated 5 May 1955.
It begins: “A portion of the Research and Development Program of [CIA’s] TSS/Chemical Division is devoted to the discovery of the following materials and methods:” What followed was a list of hoped-for drugs and their uses. The range of CIA intentions was stunning.
The CIA wanted to find substances which would “promote illogical thinking and impulsiveness.” Serious consideration should be given to the idea that psychiatric medications, food additives, herbicides, and industrial chemicals (like fluorides) would eventually satisfy that requirement.
The CIA wanted to find chemicals that “would produce the signs and symptoms of recognized diseases in a reversible way.” This suggests many possibilities—among them the use of drugs to fabricate diseases and thereby give the false impression of germ-caused epidemics.
The CIA wanted to find drugs that would “produce amnesia.” Ideal for discrediting whistleblowers, dissidents, certain political candidates, and other investigators. (Scopolamine, for example.)
The CIA wanted to discover drugs which would produce “paralysis of the legs, acute anemia, etc.” A way to make people decline in health as if from diseases.
The CIA wanted to develop drugs that would “alter personality structure” and thus induce a person’s dependence on another person. How about dependence in general? For instance, dependence on institutions, governments?
The CIA wanted to discover chemicals that would “lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men.” Sounds like a general description of the devolution of society.
My blogs prove how secret societies popularization of esoteric ideology and universal collectivism aides the process preceeding achieved world government future realization.
Click here to learn more about the Illuminati.
Sunday, March 20, 2016
Mark Rowe.
Free MacBook Pro 17 inch i7 2014
Information about the Illuminati click here
My blogs prove how secret societies popularization of esoteric ideology and universal collectivism aides the process preceeding achieved world government future realization.
Click here to learn more about the Illuminati.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)