When the president leaves for a trip to Saudi Arabia on Tuesday an unresolved issue will go with him: did the Saudis play some role in supporting the hijackers responsible for the attacks on September 11th?
The question is being raised in the wake of a renewed push to declassify 28 pages of a 838-page congressional report on the worst terror attack on American soil.
The so-called "28 pages" are locked away in a secure basement room at the Capitol and although they can be read by members of Congress, the pages remain classified.
9/11 Anniversary: Remembering the Victims 14 Years Later2:06
That the two of the hijackers involved in the September 11th attacks landed in Los Angeles, moved to San Diego and obtained housing, language lessons and identification is widely known.
However, those 28 pages could shed more light on the money and connections used to do so and are said to include information "suggesting specific sources of foreign support for some of the September 11 hijackers while they were in the United States," according to the chapter's introduction in the report.
Former Senator Bob Graham told "60 Minutes" in an interview, "I think it is implausible to believe that 19 people, most of whom didn't speak English, most of whom had never been in the United States before, many of whom didn't have a high school education — could've carried out such a complicated task without some support from within the United States."
King Salman will meet with President Obama this week.
Graham is the former chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and co-chair of the bipartisan joint congressional inquiry into intelligence failures surrounding the attacks. He wants those pages declassified and told "60 Minutes" he believes support for the hijackers came from the government, wealthy people and charities in Saudi Arabia.
The "60 minutes" report reignited debate and interest in the documents, according to Brian McGlinchey, who runs the website 28pages.org, which describes itself as a hub for the movement to declassify those pages.
"I definitely think there is some momentum," he told NBC News by phone.
The timeline to get this done appears to finally be speeding up.
The White House says the Director of National Intelligence hopes to complete the review process by the end of the year. And Graham told the Tampa Bay Times it could happen in the next month or two based on a phone call he got from a senior Obama administration official.
But the White House would not confirm that timeline and also wouldn't confirm the president even has read the 28 pages.
It also seems highly unlikely those pages will be made public before the president's trip to Saudi Arabia. The relationship between Saudi Arabia and the United States has been described by senior administration officials as both complex and complicated, made more precarious by the recent nuclear deal with Iran. This is Obama's fourth trip to Saudi Arabia, more than any other president. The visit will kick off with a bilateral meeting between Obama and the Saudi King Salman.
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said he did not know if allegations of Saudi support for the hijackers might come up during the trip and pointed out the 9/11 Commission has already looked closely at that possibility and ruled it out.
"Saudi Arabia has long been considered the primary source of funding. But we have found no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior Saudi officials individually funded the organization," Earnest quoted from the 9/11 Commission report during a briefing last week.
Jim Kreindler and Sean Carter, lawyers representing the families of victims of September 11th attacks, are fighting to have those 28 pages declassified as part of a lawsuit against the government of Saudi Arabia.
Kreindler said the White House could be doing a lot more ensure transparency.
"The administration views the 9/11 families suit as an impediment to the U.S.-Saudi relationship," he told NBC News.
He also points to the position the administration took in 2009, which advocated the Saudi kingdom should be immune from the claims filed by the families of victims because it has sovereign immunity.
"I think that he should raise not only the 28 pages, but the unresolved disputes between 9/11 families and Saudis generally," Carter said of the president's upcoming meeting with King Salman.
But, not everyone agrees those 28 pages would make a difference.
Congressman Adam Schiff, the current ranking Democrat on the Select Committee on Intelligence also wants the 28 pages declassified, but for another reason. He thinks it will put an end all the speculation that the Saudi government was involved.
"The 9/11 Commission investigated these claims and was never able to find sufficient evidence to support them," Schiff said in a statement.
The White House points to a past record of openness and transparency, including declassifying part of Senate's report on the CIA interrogation program and making public instances in which non-combatants were killed in counterterrorism operations oversea. The review of the Joint Congressional Inquiry regarding the 9/11 attacks "remains underway, but every effort is being taken to complete it before the end of the Administration".
"Until these 28 pages are freed from the vault, the American people can't make an informed evaluation of their government's past and present foreign policy and its execution of the war on terror," McGlinchey said.
Sunday, April 17, 2016
When the president leaves for a trip to Saudi Arabia on Tuesday an unresolved issue will go with him: did the Saudis play some role in supporting the hijackers responsible for the attacks on September 11th? The question is being raised in the wake of a renewed push to declassify 28 pages of a 838-page congressional report on the worst terror attack on American soil. The so-called "28 pages" are locked away in a secure basement room at the Capitol and although they can be read by members of Congress, the pages remain classified. 9/11 Anniversary: Remembering the Victims 14 Years Later2:06 That the two of the hijackers involved in the September 11th attacks landed in Los Angeles, moved to San Diego and obtained housing, language lessons and identification is widely known. However, those 28 pages could shed more light on the money and connections used to do so and are said to include information "suggesting specific sources of foreign support for some of the September 11 hijackers while they were in the United States," according to the chapter's introduction in the report. Former Senator Bob Graham told "60 Minutes" in an interview, "I think it is implausible to believe that 19 people, most of whom didn't speak English, most of whom had never been in the United States before, many of whom didn't have a high school education — could've carried out such a complicated task without some support from within the United States."
Thursday, April 14, 2016
Project MKUltra sometimes referred to as the CIA's mind control program was the code name given to an illegal program of experiments on human subjects, designed and undertaken by the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Experiments on humans were intended to identify and develop drugs and procedures to be used in interrogations and torture, in order to weaken the individual to force confessions through mind control. Organized through the Scientific Intelligence Division of the CIA, the project coordinated with the Special Operations Division of the U.S. Army's Chemical Corps.
Project MKUltra sometimes referred to as the CIA's mind control program was the code name given to an illegal program of experiments on human subjects, designed and undertaken by the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
Experiments on humans were intended to identify and develop drugs and procedures to be used in interrogations and torture, in order to weaken the individual to force confessions through mind control.
Organized through the Scientific Intelligence Division of the CIA, the project coordinated with the Special Operations Division of the U.S. Army's Chemical Corps.
illuminati leaks
info on the free and accepted masons
current nwo plans
the latest on the Rothschild family dealings
current events of the CFR
the last move of the Trilateral Commission
videos of nwo protest
nwo canceled plans
tasks abandoned for nwo due to public outcry
the decline of Royal Society influence
Rockefeller fears - nwo not possible to acheive
consideration for the revocation of Jade Helm and Agenda 21
Experiments on humans were intended to identify and develop drugs and procedures to be used in interrogations and torture, in order to weaken the individual to force confessions through mind control.
Organized through the Scientific Intelligence Division of the CIA, the project coordinated with the Special Operations Division of the U.S. Army's Chemical Corps.
illuminati leaks
info on the free and accepted masons
current nwo plans
the latest on the Rothschild family dealings
current events of the CFR
the last move of the Trilateral Commission
videos of nwo protest
nwo canceled plans
tasks abandoned for nwo due to public outcry
the decline of Royal Society influence
Rockefeller fears - nwo not possible to acheive
consideration for the revocation of Jade Helm and Agenda 21
Controversy has often surrounded psychiatry. Psychiatry's history involves what may now be seen as dangerous treatments, such as electroconvulsive therapy and lobotomy. The term anti-psychiatry was coined by psychiatrist David Cooper in 1967 and is understood in current psychiatry to mean opposition to psychiatry's perceived role in: (1) medicalizing madness, (2) drastic measures such as lobotomies used to control mental illness, (3) physical or pharmacological restraints applied to suicidal inpatients, (4) disabling or intolerable side effects of medications, (5) the diagnosis of slaves as being mentally ill for wanting to escape from their masters, (6) regarding psychoanalysis as unscientific or harmful, (7) treating homosexuality as a mental illness, and (8) diagnostic practices not based on objective scientific evidence. The general anti-psychiatry view is that psychiatric treatments are ineffective, unnecessary, or unsafe, and that ultimately psychiatric treatment is not helpful to patients. Some ex-patient groups, referring to themselves as "survivors", have become anti-psychiatric, while others are critical of anti-psychiatry as well as psychiatry.
Controversy has often surrounded psychiatry. Psychiatry's history involves what may now be seen as dangerous treatments, such as electroconvulsive therapy and lobotomy.
The term anti-psychiatry was coined by psychiatrist David Cooper in 1967 and is understood in current psychiatry to mean opposition to psychiatry's perceived role in: (1) medicalizing madness, (2) drastic measures such as lobotomies used to control mental illness, (3) physical or pharmacological restraints applied to suicidal inpatients, (4) disabling or intolerable side effects of medications, (5) the diagnosis of slaves as being mentally ill for wanting to escape from their masters, (6) regarding psychoanalysis as unscientific or harmful, (7) treating homosexuality as a mental illness, and (8) diagnostic practices not based on objective scientific evidence.
The general anti-psychiatry view is that psychiatric treatments are ineffective, unnecessary, or unsafe, and that ultimately psychiatric treatment is not helpful to patients. Some ex-patient groups, referring to themselves as "survivors", have become anti-psychiatric, while others are critical of anti-psychiatry as well as psychiatry.
The term anti-psychiatry was coined by psychiatrist David Cooper in 1967 and is understood in current psychiatry to mean opposition to psychiatry's perceived role in: (1) medicalizing madness, (2) drastic measures such as lobotomies used to control mental illness, (3) physical or pharmacological restraints applied to suicidal inpatients, (4) disabling or intolerable side effects of medications, (5) the diagnosis of slaves as being mentally ill for wanting to escape from their masters, (6) regarding psychoanalysis as unscientific or harmful, (7) treating homosexuality as a mental illness, and (8) diagnostic practices not based on objective scientific evidence.
The general anti-psychiatry view is that psychiatric treatments are ineffective, unnecessary, or unsafe, and that ultimately psychiatric treatment is not helpful to patients. Some ex-patient groups, referring to themselves as "survivors", have become anti-psychiatric, while others are critical of anti-psychiatry as well as psychiatry.
Wednesday, April 13, 2016
The following was written by Mark R. Rowe on Wednesday, April 13th during the year 2016 in the zip code 92113 of the city of San Diego What Great Britain did was justified? Yes or no? From 1607-1759 and from 1760-1853. The colonial era in the prior and the industrial revolution in the latter. How would you feel if you were a person that lived during the 17th century, but you happened to be brought up in a Native American tribe? How would you feel if you were a person that lived during the mid-19th century, but you were brought up in Nepal? How would you feel if you were a person that lived during either the 17th, 18th, or during the first half of the 19th century, but you were forced to travel over 4,000 miles ("The Great Trek") - from central Nigeria to The Cape of Good Hope - on foot while shackled with iron chains and iron clasps at both your neck and ankles connecting the men in your community that rightfully owned the land that you were stolen from, to be sent to multiple human expeditionary camps on Island in the Caribbean Sea, and then awaiting a final sea-bound ship to be enslaved by manual labor for the remainder of your life in the land of the "New Order of the Ages", called the United States of America.
The following was written by Mark R. Rowe on Wednesday, April 13th during the year 2016 in the zip code 92113 of the city of San Diego
What Great Britain did was justified? Yes or no? From 1607-1759 and from 1760-1853. The colonial era in the prior and the industrial revolution in the latter.
How would you feel if you were a person that lived during the 17th century, but you happened to be brought up in a Native American tribe? How would you feel if you were a person that lived during the mid-19th century, but you were brought up in Nepal? How would you feel if you were a person that lived during either the 17th, 18th, or during the first half of the 19th century, but you were forced to travel over 4,000 miles ("The Great Trek") - from central Nigeria to The Cape of Good Hope - on foot while shackled with iron chains and iron clasps at both your neck and ankles connecting the men in your community that rightfully owned the land that you were stolen from, to be sent to multiple human expeditionary camps on Island in the Caribbean Sea, and then awaiting a final sea-bound ship to be enslaved by manual labor for the remainder of your life in the land of the "New Order of the Ages", called the United States of America, additionally not to mention the following below
p -70 million Native American live murdered by Spainards, French, Dutch, and British?
-Unaccounted number of in the millions of Africans killed by thier slave masters.
-India's land manipulated, stolen, and divided by England.
-Eskimos killed in Canada.
-Aborigines killed by the British in Australia.
Should this type of Imperialistic action taken by many Western European nations including the USA somehow looked at with a deep sense of respect when the only way these western nations got to be economic and military superpowers was due to thier overseas colonial and trading enterprises while the militaries of these Western European killed tens of millions of people that stood in their way while they were standing on their rightfully owned land, enslaving millions to work for free on farms, taking full control of distant lands' governing powers, while governing and laying the framework for this nations "Great Britain's way of doing things," meanwhile profiting huge sums of money by taxing the work done by people that were native to a land not Great Britain.
But the rule of law at the expense of killing everyone in order to establish the "rule of law" in the first place, is a lot stronger and smarter.
This directly contributed to the next era in history, that is the event of the Industrial Revolution first in Great Britain, and then in the USA.
After the Industrial Revolution era, we have the Modern Era, the one that we are in now, specifically the Electronics Era within the Modern Era.
Are there any conclusions to be drawn from the consequences of these last three era's in history direct relationship(s) upon each other in chronological order?
What Great Britain did was justified? Yes or no? From 1607-1759 and from 1760-1853. The colonial era in the prior and the industrial revolution in the latter.
How would you feel if you were a person that lived during the 17th century, but you happened to be brought up in a Native American tribe? How would you feel if you were a person that lived during the mid-19th century, but you were brought up in Nepal? How would you feel if you were a person that lived during either the 17th, 18th, or during the first half of the 19th century, but you were forced to travel over 4,000 miles ("The Great Trek") - from central Nigeria to The Cape of Good Hope - on foot while shackled with iron chains and iron clasps at both your neck and ankles connecting the men in your community that rightfully owned the land that you were stolen from, to be sent to multiple human expeditionary camps on Island in the Caribbean Sea, and then awaiting a final sea-bound ship to be enslaved by manual labor for the remainder of your life in the land of the "New Order of the Ages", called the United States of America, additionally not to mention the following below
p -70 million Native American live murdered by Spainards, French, Dutch, and British?
-Unaccounted number of in the millions of Africans killed by thier slave masters.
-India's land manipulated, stolen, and divided by England.
-Eskimos killed in Canada.
-Aborigines killed by the British in Australia.
Should this type of Imperialistic action taken by many Western European nations including the USA somehow looked at with a deep sense of respect when the only way these western nations got to be economic and military superpowers was due to thier overseas colonial and trading enterprises while the militaries of these Western European killed tens of millions of people that stood in their way while they were standing on their rightfully owned land, enslaving millions to work for free on farms, taking full control of distant lands' governing powers, while governing and laying the framework for this nations "Great Britain's way of doing things," meanwhile profiting huge sums of money by taxing the work done by people that were native to a land not Great Britain.
But the rule of law at the expense of killing everyone in order to establish the "rule of law" in the first place, is a lot stronger and smarter.
This directly contributed to the next era in history, that is the event of the Industrial Revolution first in Great Britain, and then in the USA.
After the Industrial Revolution era, we have the Modern Era, the one that we are in now, specifically the Electronics Era within the Modern Era.
Are there any conclusions to be drawn from the consequences of these last three era's in history direct relationship(s) upon each other in chronological order?
The following was written by Mark R. Rowe on Wednesday, April 13th during the year 2016 Am I God? Are you God? Is there a person that is God, that has the equivalent power that only God has, that is to give life and take life? Why can't we as a society, move away from the ideas of infanticide and a must needed population with only people that do not posses mental and physical defects at birth? Children as young as 4 are being drugged with harmful chemicals that cause diabetes and livers disease in the US and other nations. We are conditioned to believe that if a person is diagnosed with a mental disorder that this person is de facto "mentally ill," however if you had the opportunity to make a person a lifetime payer of 100 dollars per hour on a weekly or daily basis, would you take that opportunity? We should not play God with Gods creation by severing the scrotum of a boy or man, or cutting the tubes of a girl or woman, known as vasectomies and tube tying when knowledge learned that this person might be mentally ill. What God wants for us is written in the Holy Bible. Does the Bible tell us to pre-plan mass murder on the masses of the world by the medical practices of Eugenics? Did Former White House Joint Chief of Staff Major General Collin Powell grow up in desperate poverty during the 1950's and 1960's in Harlem, New York City?
The following was written by Mark R. Rowe on Wednesday, April 13th during the year 2016
Am I God? Are you God? Is there a person that is God, that has the equivalent power that only God has, that is to give life and take life?
Why can't we as a society, move away from the ideas of infanticide and a must needed population with only people that do not posses mental and physical defects at birth?
Children as young as 4 are being drugged with harmful chemicals that cause diabetes and livers disease in the US and other nations.
We are conditioned to believe that if a person is diagnosed with a mental disorder that this person is de facto "mentally ill," however if you had the opportunity to make a person a lifetime payer of 100 dollars per hour on a weekly or daily basis, would you take that opportunity?
We should not play God with Gods creation by severing the scrotum of a boy or man, or cutting the tubes of a girl or woman, known as vasectomies and tube tying when knowledge learned that this person might be mentally ill.
What God wants for us is written in the Holy Bible.
Does the Bible tell us to pre-plan mass murder on the masses of the world by the medical practices of Eugenics?
Did Former White House Joint Chief of Staff Major General Collin Powell grow up in desperate poverty during the 1950's and 1960's in Harlem, New York City?
Am I God? Are you God? Is there a person that is God, that has the equivalent power that only God has, that is to give life and take life?
Why can't we as a society, move away from the ideas of infanticide and a must needed population with only people that do not posses mental and physical defects at birth?
Children as young as 4 are being drugged with harmful chemicals that cause diabetes and livers disease in the US and other nations.
We are conditioned to believe that if a person is diagnosed with a mental disorder that this person is de facto "mentally ill," however if you had the opportunity to make a person a lifetime payer of 100 dollars per hour on a weekly or daily basis, would you take that opportunity?
We should not play God with Gods creation by severing the scrotum of a boy or man, or cutting the tubes of a girl or woman, known as vasectomies and tube tying when knowledge learned that this person might be mentally ill.
What God wants for us is written in the Holy Bible.
Does the Bible tell us to pre-plan mass murder on the masses of the world by the medical practices of Eugenics?
Did Former White House Joint Chief of Staff Major General Collin Powell grow up in desperate poverty during the 1950's and 1960's in Harlem, New York City?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)