Showing posts with label this. Show all posts
Showing posts with label this. Show all posts
Tuesday, August 13, 2019
THIS WILL BE BLOCKED BILL COOPER Explains Everything
THIS WILL BE BLOCKED BILL COOPER Explains Everything.
Friday, June 2, 2017
JP Morgan Stanley chocked on a tall Starbucks latte this morning.
Click here to learn more about the Illuminati.
JP Morgan Stanley chocked on a tall Starbucks latte this morning.
Monday, May 11, 2015
Keep up the Devil's work. Why type of sacrifice did you think would never get exposed on a massive level, John B. Watson?
Free MacBook Pro 17 inch i7 2014
The aim of Watson and Rayner was to condition phobias into an emotionally stable child. They chose "Albert" for this study (at the age of about nine months) from a hospital.
As the preliminary to the experiment, Little Albert was given a battery of baseline emotional tests: the infant was exposed, briefly and for the first time, to a white rabbit, a rat, a dog, a monkey, masks (with and without hair), cotton, wool, burning newspapers, and other stimuli. During the baseline, Little Albert showed no fear toward any of these items. Albert was then placed on a mattress on a table in the middle of a room.
A white laboratory rat was placed near Albert and he was allowed to play with it. At this point, the child showed no fear of the rat. He began to reach out to the rat as it roamed around him. In later trials, Watson and Rayner made a loud sound behind Albert's back by striking a suspended steel bar with a hammer when the baby touched the rat. Little Albert responded to the noise by crying and showing fear. After several such pairings of the two stimuli, Albert was again presented with only the rat. Now, however, he became very distressed as the rat appeared in the room. He cried, turned away from the rat, and tried to move away. Apparently, the baby boy had associated the white rat (originally a neutral stimulus, now a conditioned stimulus) with the loud noise (an unconditioned stimulus) and was producing the fearful or emotional response of crying (originally the unconditioned response to the noise, now the conditioned response to the rat).
This experiment led to the following progression of results: First, the introduction of a loud sound (unconditioned stimulus) resulted in fear (unconditioned response)—a natural response. Secondly, the introduction of a rat (neutral stimulus) paired with the loud sound (unconditioned stimulus) eventually resulted in fear (unconditioned response). Finally, the successive introductions of only a rat (conditioned stimulus) resulted in fear (conditioned response). Therefore, learning was demonstrated.
The experiment did not have a control subject.
.JPG)
.JPG)
Information about the Illuminati click here
As the preliminary to the experiment, Little Albert was given a battery of baseline emotional tests: the infant was exposed, briefly and for the first time, to a white rabbit, a rat, a dog, a monkey, masks (with and without hair), cotton, wool, burning newspapers, and other stimuli. During the baseline, Little Albert showed no fear toward any of these items. Albert was then placed on a mattress on a table in the middle of a room.
A white laboratory rat was placed near Albert and he was allowed to play with it. At this point, the child showed no fear of the rat. He began to reach out to the rat as it roamed around him. In later trials, Watson and Rayner made a loud sound behind Albert's back by striking a suspended steel bar with a hammer when the baby touched the rat. Little Albert responded to the noise by crying and showing fear. After several such pairings of the two stimuli, Albert was again presented with only the rat. Now, however, he became very distressed as the rat appeared in the room. He cried, turned away from the rat, and tried to move away. Apparently, the baby boy had associated the white rat (originally a neutral stimulus, now a conditioned stimulus) with the loud noise (an unconditioned stimulus) and was producing the fearful or emotional response of crying (originally the unconditioned response to the noise, now the conditioned response to the rat).
This experiment led to the following progression of results: First, the introduction of a loud sound (unconditioned stimulus) resulted in fear (unconditioned response)—a natural response. Secondly, the introduction of a rat (neutral stimulus) paired with the loud sound (unconditioned stimulus) eventually resulted in fear (unconditioned response). Finally, the successive introductions of only a rat (conditioned stimulus) resulted in fear (conditioned response). Therefore, learning was demonstrated.
The experiment did not have a control subject.
(206) 447-1575 Call Starbucks Corporate and tell them about the disrespectful employee this morning. (206) 447-1575,
Call Starbucks Corporate and tell them about the disrespectful employee this morning.
Thursday, May 7, 2015
85 years of a very high standard of living is valued far less than a person of whom may or may not have a very high standard of, but this person did something in his or her life that caused the majority of the people living in the world to remember him or her for an indefinite amount of time in the future.
To be remembered forever in the present history and also in the future history of the world is to me, worth more than tens of millions of dollars. I had the opportunity to remain married to my ex-wife of whom is was worth five million dollars, within ten years of our wedding date, and of whom currently has inherited all of her fathers five million dollars, however I divorced her in 2003 since she was unfaithful to me several times including on our honeymoon in three of very large Western-European cities to include Rome, Florence, Paris and London.
The reason why I am arguing that the value of being remembered by the majority of the people in the world is greater than the value of tens of millions of dollars is because I desire to show that 85 years of a very high standard of living is valued far less than a person of whom may or may not have a very high standard of, but this person did something in his or her life that caused the majority of the people living in the world to remember him or her for an indefinite amount of time in the future.
Wednesday, May 6, 2015
If,the,U.S.,government,takes,away,the,internet,from,the,people,of,this,world,at,any,point,in,the,future,then,this,action,will,only,create,total,anarchy,chaos
Written by Mark R. Rowe in San Diego, CA on 3/5/2015
If the U.S. government takes away the internet from the people of this world at any point in the future, then this action will only create total anarchy, chaos, panic, and turn (for example) some with a Ph. D. from Princeton into to a street thug overnight.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)